Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Dunamis Charge Inc. is dealing with 1 pending office action in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. This action is under the review of 1 distinct examiner, ZHOU, ZIXUAN, who is also the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending office action. The prosecution is occurring within 1 distinct art unit, pointing to a concentrated area of technical interest.
Having 1 distinct examiner for the entire pending portfolio allows for a singular focus in communication and strategy. Practitioners do not need to reconcile different examiner styles, as all current feedback comes from ZHOU, ZIXUAN. The limitation to 1 distinct art unit further implies that the company's current semiconductor and optics innovations are being evaluated within a single specialized group at the USPTO.
The 1 pending office action represents the total current workload for the portfolio. Since the busiest examiner pending count is also 1, there is no distribution of work across multiple staff members. This provides a clear and direct path for prosecution, as the company only needs to manage the requirements of 1 distinct art unit and its assigned examiner in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZHOU, ZIXUAN | 1 | 76.3% | +17.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18196464 | Electric Vehicle Charging Station | ZHOU, ZIXUAN | 70d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18196464 | Electric Vehicle Charging Station | ZHOU, ZIXUAN | 70d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2859 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18196464 | Electric Vehicle Charging Station | ZHOU, ZIXUAN | 2859 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 70d | Pending | May 12, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial