Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 07, 2026

DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH

10 pending office actions • 4 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 11 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
4
Medium (40%)
2
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (20%)
§112 only1 (10%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Double-patenting + other2 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
10
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DAVID, MICHAEL D 2 81.9% +14.0%
BERGIN, JAMES S 2 79.3% +10.1%
ANDREWS, DAVID L 1 71.6% +16.1%
AKARAGWE, YANICK A 1 83.3% +12.2%
AFZALI, SARANG 1 73.3% +45.2%
ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 1 61.1% +35.4%
GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S 1 66.9% +29.2%
ABDOSH, SAMIR 1 83.9% +6.5%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18801095 SHAPED CHARGE LINER TO REDUCE HYDRAULIC INDUCED EROSION ON PERFORATING HOLES ABDOSH, SAMIR 6d
19431111 Method and Apparatus for Automatic Arming of Perforating Gun DAVID, MICHAEL D
19141892 PERFORATING GUN STRING WITH REPEATER COMMUNICATION AKARAGWE, YANICK A

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19066690 SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED ASSEMBLY OF A TOOL STRING AFZALI, SARANG 46d overdue
19244968 TECHNIQUES FOR CONNECTING WELLBORE TOOLS IN A TOOL STRING ANDREWS, DAVID L 22d overdue
19085107 DETONATOR WITH FUSED HEAD RETENTION FEATURES DAVID, MICHAEL D
19035550 MOBILE PERFORATING BANK UNIT AND MODULAR STORAGE CONTAINER ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19066690 SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED ASSEMBLY OF A TOOL STRING AFZALI, SARANG 46d overdue
19244968 TECHNIQUES FOR CONNECTING WELLBORE TOOLS IN A TOOL STRING ANDREWS, DAVID L 22d overdue
19431111 Method and Apparatus for Automatic Arming of Perforating Gun DAVID, MICHAEL D
19141892 PERFORATING GUN STRING WITH REPEATER COMMUNICATION AKARAGWE, YANICK A
19095821 INITIATOR HEAD WITH CIRCUIT BOARD BERGIN, JAMES S
19085107 DETONATOR WITH FUSED HEAD RETENTION FEATURES DAVID, MICHAEL D
19035550 MOBILE PERFORATING BANK UNIT AND MODULAR STORAGE CONTAINER ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO
18977129 DETONATOR POSITIONING DEVICE GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3641 6
3672 2
3726 1
3736 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19431111 Method and Apparatus for Automatic Arming of Perforating Gun DAVID, MICHAEL D 3641 DP Non-Final OA Pending Dec 23, 2025
19244968 TECHNIQUES FOR CONNECTING WELLBORE TOOLS IN A TOOL STRING ANDREWS, DAVID L 3672 §102§103Other Non-Final OA 22d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2025
19141892 PERFORATING GUN STRING WITH REPEATER COMMUNICATION AKARAGWE, YANICK A 3672 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jun 20, 2025
19095821 INITIATOR HEAD WITH CIRCUIT BOARD BERGIN, JAMES S 3641 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA Pending Mar 31, 2025
19085107 DETONATOR WITH FUSED HEAD RETENTION FEATURES DAVID, MICHAEL D 3641 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 20, 2025
19066690 SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED ASSEMBLY OF A TOOL STRING AFZALI, SARANG 3726 §103§112 Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending Feb 28, 2025
19035550 MOBILE PERFORATING BANK UNIT AND MODULAR STORAGE CONTAINER ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 3736 §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Jan 23, 2025
18977129 DETONATOR POSITIONING DEVICE GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S 3641 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA Pending Dec 11, 2024
18801095 SHAPED CHARGE LINER TO REDUCE HYDRAULIC INDUCED EROSION ON PERFORATING HOLES ABDOSH, SAMIR 3641 §103 Non-Final OA 6d Pending Aug 12, 2024
18393533 DETONATOR CARTRIDGE FOR PERFORATING GUN ASSEMBLY BERGIN, JAMES S 3641 §112 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 21, 2023

Managing DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month