Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

E2Interactive Inc.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

E2Interactive Inc. is currently managing 3 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are distributed across 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that the portfolio's prosecution is not concentrated under a single individual. This distribution requires the practitioner to manage multiple examiner relationships simultaneously.

The portfolio also involves 3 distinct art units. The presence of 3 distinct art units suggests that the company's patent applications cover a variety of technical subjects within the transportation and e-commerce sectors. Each art unit may have its own procedural nuances, requiring a flexible approach to prosecution across the different pending matters.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is ANDERSON, SCOTT C, who is currently handling 1 pending office action. Since this 1 pending office action is a portion of the total active cases, the workload is spread among the 3 distinct examiners. Practitioners should tailor their strategies to ANDERSON, SCOTT C while also addressing the requirements of the other examiners involved in the 3 distinct art units.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ANDERSON, SCOTT C 1 58.6% +31.6%
GARTLAND, SCOTT D 1 10.9% +12.2%
NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 1 30.2% +39.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
14828948 TARGETED ADVERTISING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A RETAIL KIOSK GARTLAND, SCOTT D 43d overdue
17210755 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application ANDERSON, SCOTT C 79d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
13717424 NOTEBOOK TRANSACTION CARD HOLDER NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 146d overdue
14828948 TARGETED ADVERTISING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A RETAIL KIOSK GARTLAND, SCOTT D 43d overdue
17210755 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application ANDERSON, SCOTT C 79d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3694 1
3685 1
3735 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17210755 Item Eligibility and/or Promotion Determination Application ANDERSON, SCOTT C 3694 §101§112 Non-Final OA 79d Pending Mar 24, 2021
14828948 TARGETED ADVERTISING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A RETAIL KIOSK GARTLAND, SCOTT D 3685 §101§103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Aug 18, 2015
13717424 NOTEBOOK TRANSACTION CARD HOLDER NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 3735 §103 Final Rejection 146d overdue Pending Dec 17, 2012

Managing E2Interactive Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month