Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
E5 Incorporated currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, GREEN, ANTHONY J. The prosecution is further localized within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a very specific technical focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts.
The busiest examiner for E5 Incorporated is GREEN, ANTHONY J, who is in charge of the 1 pending office action. Because this is the only pending action in the portfolio, the examiner's role is pivotal to the company's immediate success in the Chemistry & Materials sector. Practitioners must focus their efforts on meeting the specific requirements of this single examiner and the standards of the 1 distinct art unit involved.
The high level of concentration, with only 1 pending office action and 1 distinct examiner, suggests a targeted approach to patenting. There is no distribution of risk across different examiners or art units at this time. Consequently, the outcome of the current prosecution cycle depends entirely on the resolution of the 1 pending office action under the guidance of GREEN, ANTHONY J.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GREEN, ANTHONY J | 1 | 85.0% | +13.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18882891 | COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED CONCRETE PERFORMANCE | GREEN, ANTHONY J | 9d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18882891 | COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED CONCRETE PERFORMANCE | GREEN, ANTHONY J | 9d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1731 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18882891 | COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED CONCRETE PERFORMANCE | GREEN, ANTHONY J | 1731 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 9d | Pending | Sep 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial