Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEFAYATI, SOORENA | 1 | 83.0% | +7.8% |
| JONES, DIANA S | 1 | 74.5% | +20.4% |
| SCHMITT, BENJAMIN R | 1 | 84.6% | +15.7% |
| OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE | 1 | 72.4% | +29.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18047553 | DEVICE FOR USE IN COMPUTER-AIDED SURGERY | SCHMITT, BENJAMIN R | 16d |
| 18032261 | METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING A TRAJECTORY OF A MOTORIZED C-ARM | KEFAYATI, SOORENA | 20d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18169469 | SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR CEMENTOPLASTY | JONES, DIANA S | 19d overdue |
| 17913604 | Method and System for Determining a Safety Criterion during an Autonomous Manipulation of a Surgical Tool by a Robotic System to Treat an Anatomical Structure | OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE | 11d overdue |
| 18047553 | DEVICE FOR USE IN COMPUTER-AIDED SURGERY | SCHMITT, BENJAMIN R | 16d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2884 | 1 |
| 3775 | 1 |
| 2852 | 1 |
| 2668 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18032261 | METHOD FOR OPTIMIZING A TRAJECTORY OF A MOTORIZED C-ARM | KEFAYATI, SOORENA | 2884 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 20d | Pending | Apr 17, 2023 |
| 18169469 | SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR CEMENTOPLASTY | JONES, DIANA S | 3775 | §103 | Final Rejection | 19d overdue | Pending | Feb 15, 2023 |
| 18047553 | DEVICE FOR USE IN COMPUTER-AIDED SURGERY | SCHMITT, BENJAMIN R | 2852 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 16d | Pending | Oct 18, 2022 |
| 17913604 | Method and System for Determining a Safety Criterion during an Autonomous Manipulation of a Surgical Tool by a Robotic System to Treat an Anatomical Structure | OMETZ, RACHEL ANNE | 2668 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 11d overdue | Pending | Sep 22, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial