Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Eco3 BV operates in the Chemistry & Materials technology area with 1 pending office action. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, pointing to a concentrated prosecution effort. The data also shows 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the company's current patent work is focused within a specific technical niche of the chemistry field. This concentration implies that the company's current legal focus is limited to a specific administrative division.
The busiest examiner identified is PEO, KARA M, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 busiest examiner pending action, this individual is the sole point of contact for the company's active matters. Practitioners should note that the prosecution strategy is entirely dependent on the decisions made within this one art unit. This centralized profile simplifies the management of the portfolio but places all current progress in the hands of a single examiner.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PEO, KARA M | 1 | 42.5% | +37.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17904566 | EQUIPMENT FOR THE FILTRATION OF A SUSPENSION USING A ROTARY PRECOAT FILTER | PEO, KARA M | 279d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1777 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17904566 | EQUIPMENT FOR THE FILTRATION OF A SUSPENSION USING A ROTARY PRECOAT FILTER | PEO, KARA M | 1777 | §103 | Final Rejection | 279d overdue | Pending | Aug 18, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial