Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eishin Technology Co. Ltd. has a company patent portfolio focused on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. Currently, there is 1 pending office action for the company. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TRAVERS, MATTHEW P.
The prosecution is located within 1 distinct art unit. TRAVERS, MATTHEW P is the busiest examiner, handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This indicates that the company's current active patent matters are concentrated in a single area of medical or mechanical technology.
Practitioners should note the nature of this portfolio, where 1 pending office action is managed by 1 examiner in 1 art unit. This allows for a direct and focused prosecution strategy. The alignment with the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area suggests the company is protecting specific mechanical innovations. Having only 1 pending action under a single examiner reduces the complexity of managing the company's intellectual property assets at this time.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAVERS, MATTHEW P | 1 | 63.2% | +43.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18729021 | CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION DEVICE AND CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION METHOD | TRAVERS, MATTHEW P | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18729021 | CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION DEVICE AND CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION METHOD | TRAVERS, MATTHEW P | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3726 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18729021 | CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION DEVICE AND CONDUCTOR BUNDLE SEPARATION METHOD | TRAVERS, MATTHEW P | 3726 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial