Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Elebia Autohooks S L U has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, TIGHE, BRENDAN P. The matter is being reviewed within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting the technical specialization of the company's current filing. This concentration of the 1 pending action within a single art unit reflects a focused technical scope for the company's current filing.
TIGHE, BRENDAN P is the busiest examiner with 1 pending action. Because the company only has 1 pending office action, this examiner is responsible for the entire active workload. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the 1 pending action indicates that the prosecution is currently streamlined through a single administrative and technical path. Practitioners should analyze the past decisions of TIGHE, BRENDAN P to better understand the likely outcome.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TIGHE, BRENDAN P | 1 | 76.0% | +19.3% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18570602 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANIPULATING CONTAINERS | TIGHE, BRENDAN P | 4d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18570602 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANIPULATING CONTAINERS | TIGHE, BRENDAN P | 4d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3652 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18570602 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANIPULATING CONTAINERS | TIGHE, BRENDAN P | 3652 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 4d overdue | Pending | Jun 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial