Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Electrochaea GmbH

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (67%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (67%)
§112 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOBBS, MICHAEL L 1 68.6% +28.4%
BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 1 26.0% +58.6%
EDWARDS, JESSICA FAYE 1 44.2% +46.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17904119 BIOCATALYST ADAPTATION AS LOAD FOLLOWING SOLUTION BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 29d

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17289377 METHOD TO USE INDUSTRIAL CO2 CONTAINING GAS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A METHANE ENRICHED GAS COMPOSITION EDWARDS, JESSICA FAYE 119d overdue
18563504 REACTOR PLANT AND METHOD TO CONTROL PERFORMANCE HOBBS, MICHAEL L 7d
17904119 BIOCATALYST ADAPTATION AS LOAD FOLLOWING SOLUTION BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 29d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1657 2
1799 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18563504 REACTOR PLANT AND METHOD TO CONTROL PERFORMANCE HOBBS, MICHAEL L 1799 §112 Final Rejection 7d Pending Nov 22, 2023
17904119 BIOCATALYST ADAPTATION AS LOAD FOLLOWING SOLUTION BREEN, KIMBERLY CATHERINE 1657 §103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Aug 12, 2022
17289377 METHOD TO USE INDUSTRIAL CO2 CONTAINING GAS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF A METHANE ENRICHED GAS COMPOSITION EDWARDS, JESSICA FAYE 1657 §103 Non-Final OA 119d overdue Pending Apr 28, 2021

Managing Electrochaea GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month