Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Electrolux Home Products Inc.

5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHAUDHRI, OMAIR 1 65.5% +26.1%
GREENLUND, JOSEPH A 1 67.0% +34.8%
CAMPBELL, THOR S 1 74.9% +0.9%
LEFF, STEVEN N 1 40.7% +7.3%
GRUSBY, REBECCA LYNN 1 32.0% +48.5%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17721503 DEAD-FRONT USER INTERFACE GRUSBY, REBECCA LYNN 134d overdue
18028817 FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM GREENLUND, JOSEPH A 111d overdue
18730712 ISOLATED VOLTAGE DOOR LATCH FOR AN APPLIANCE CHAUDHRI, OMAIR 70d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1711 1
3752 1
3761 1
1792 1
1785 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18730712 ISOLATED VOLTAGE DOOR LATCH FOR AN APPLIANCE CHAUDHRI, OMAIR 1711 §103 Non-Final OA 70d Pending Jul 19, 2024
18028817 FIRE PREVENTION SYSTEM GREENLUND, JOSEPH A 3752 §103 Non-Final OA 111d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2023
18028048 UTENSIL PROFILE DETERMINATION SYSTEM CAMPBELL, THOR S 3761 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Mar 23, 2023
18028186 ASSISTED COOKING LEFF, STEVEN N 1792 §103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Mar 23, 2023
17721503 DEAD-FRONT USER INTERFACE GRUSBY, REBECCA LYNN 1785 §103 Final Rejection 134d overdue Pending Apr 15, 2022

Managing Electrolux Home Products Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month