Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Electrovaya Inc. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 2 actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, providing a varied perspective on the company's chemical innovations from different officials. Both actions are housed within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a high degree of technical similarity between the pending applications and a consistent classification of the company's materials technology.
Reena Aurora is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 pending action. Because both cases are in 1 art unit, the company can expect a consistent application of technical standards and prior art searches even though 2 distinct examiners are involved. The 2 pending office actions represent the current active front for the company's materials-based intellectual property, offering separate opportunities for allowance within the same technical division.
Practitioners should analyze the feedback from both Reena Aurora and the other distinct examiner to identify any common technical hurdles within the 1 art unit. This dual-examiner, single-unit structure allows the company to test different claim strategies for its Chemistry & Materials innovations while remaining within a stable regulatory environment. The outcome of these 2 pending office actions will be a key indicator of the company's success in protecting its latest chemical developments.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| §112 only | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AURORA, REENA | 1 | 87.1% | -13.4% |
| OROZCO, MARIA F | 1 | 69.6% | +0.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19065352 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING ELECTRICAL LEAKAGE | AURORA, REENA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1729 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19065352 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING ELECTRICAL LEAKAGE | AURORA, REENA | — | §112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 27, 2025 |
| 17696649 | RECHARGEABLE SOLID-STATE LITHIUM ION BATTERY | OROZCO, MARIA F | 1729 | §103 | Final Rejection | 15d | Pending | Mar 16, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial