Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Elif Bilge Kavun

Technology area: Networking & Security

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Elif Bilge Kavun currently has 1 pending office action in the Networking & Security technology area. This single action is located within 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused technical scope for the current patent activity. The concentration in 1 art unit allows for a prosecution approach tailored to the specific guidelines of that USPTO division.

The prosecution is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, MOHAMMADI, FAHIMEH M, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. With 1 distinct examiner for the 1 pending action, the immediate patent success is tied to a single point of contact. This one-to-one ratio simplifies the management of the portfolio but makes the outcome highly dependent on the specific examiner's review.

The focus on Networking & Security ensures that the legal strategy remains aligned with the specific patentability standards of that technology sector. With only 1 pending action, the practitioner can dedicate all resources to resolving the specific issues raised by MOHAMMADI, FAHIMEH M to advance the application toward allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MOHAMMADI, FAHIMEH M 1 76.6% +51.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19104526 Method for Providing a Digital Key MOHAMMADI, FAHIMEH M —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19104526 Method for Providing a Digital Key MOHAMMADI, FAHIMEH M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2439 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19104526 Method for Providing a Digital Key MOHAMMADI, FAHIMEH M 2439 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 18, 2025

Managing Elif Bilge Kavun's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month