Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Eml Co. Ltd. maintains 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The prosecution of this matter is handled by a distinct examiner in a distinct art unit. ABOAGYE, MICHAEL is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, currently overseeing the 1 pending office action. This distribution reflects a highly centralized prosecution strategy with no current diversification across different USPTO personnel.
The reliance on a single examiner means that the applicant's success in the Chemistry & Materials sector is currently tied to the specific perspectives of ABOAGYE, MICHAEL. Practitioners cannot leverage trends from other pending cases to inform their approach in this instance. This concentration suggests that the company is focusing its resources on a specific technological advancement. Navigating the procedural preferences of the assigned art unit is critical, as there are no other active matters to provide a baseline for comparison.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABOAGYE, MICHAEL | 1 | 75.4% | +37.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18897071 | COMPOSITE INJECTION DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING ULTRAFINE METALLIC POWDER | ABOAGYE, MICHAEL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18897071 | COMPOSITE INJECTION DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING ULTRAFINE METALLIC POWDER | ABOAGYE, MICHAEL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1733 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18897071 | COMPOSITE INJECTION DEVICE FOR MANUFACTURING ULTRAFINE METALLIC POWDER | ABOAGYE, MICHAEL | 1733 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEml Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Michael Aboagye has the most, with 1 of Eml Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
