Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Emotiv Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Emotiv Co. Ltd. is actively prosecuting 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution shows that the company's current legal challenges are not concentrated under a single point of review at the patent office, even though the total number of pending actions is low. The involvement of 2 art units indicates that the underlying technology may have diverse applications or complex features that fall under different classification systems.

The busiest examiner identified in the data is MORALES, JON ERIC C, who is overseeing 1 pending office action. With 2 distinct examiners involved in the 2 pending actions, the workload is distributed. This variety in art units and examiners requires a strategy that accounts for different perspectives within the broader medical and mechanical engineering fields. For practitioners, this means that the prosecution of one application may not necessarily predict the path of the other, as each is subject to the unique standards and preferences of different examiners. The company's current status reflects a decentralized approach to its pending intellectual property, where each matter is isolated in its own administrative channel.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (50%)
§103 only1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORALES, JON ERIC C 1 85.4% +10.0%
ANTOINE, LISA HOPE 1 16.1% +67.6%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18691855 COGNITIVE MODEL-BASED COGNITIVE STATE EVALUTION SYSTEM BASED ON COGNITIVE MODEL FOR SUBSTITUTING COGNITIVE TEST TASK USING LEARNING-BASED USER-CUSTOMIZED COGNITIVE MODEL MORALES, JON ERIC C 29d
18511934 SERVICE APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING DAILY BEHAVIORS OF PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME ANTOINE, LISA HOPE —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18691855 COGNITIVE MODEL-BASED COGNITIVE STATE EVALUTION SYSTEM BASED ON COGNITIVE MODEL FOR SUBSTITUTING COGNITIVE TEST TASK USING LEARNING-BASED USER-CUSTOMIZED COGNITIVE MODEL MORALES, JON ERIC C 29d
18511934 SERVICE APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING DAILY BEHAVIORS OF PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME ANTOINE, LISA HOPE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3796 1
3715 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18691855 COGNITIVE MODEL-BASED COGNITIVE STATE EVALUTION SYSTEM BASED ON COGNITIVE MODEL FOR SUBSTITUTING COGNITIVE TEST TASK USING LEARNING-BASED USER-CUSTOMIZED COGNITIVE MODEL MORALES, JON ERIC C 3796 §101§102 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Mar 13, 2024
18511934 SERVICE APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING DAILY BEHAVIORS OF PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME ANTOINE, LISA HOPE 3715 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 16, 2023

Managing Emotiv Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month