Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN | 1 | 81.0% | +20.8% |
| RADOMSKI, MARTIN ADAM | 1 | 25.0% | +55.6% |
| SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE | 1 | 58.7% | +36.4% |
| GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA | 1 | 72.2% | +41.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19012552 | RECONSTITUTION DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD | ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN | 46d overdue |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18069858 | MEDICAL FLUID INJECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH REUSABLE PATCH | RADOMSKI, MARTIN ADAM | 8d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16923612 | MEDICAL VIAL AND INJECTOR ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS OF USE | SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE | 86d overdue |
| 19012552 | RECONSTITUTION DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD | ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN | 46d overdue |
| 18069858 | MEDICAL FLUID INJECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH REUSABLE PATCH | RADOMSKI, MARTIN ADAM | 8d |
| 16669810 | Pressurized Gas Powered Medicament Transfer And Re-Suspension Apparatus And Method | GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA | 27d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3783 | 3 |
| 3753 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19012552 | RECONSTITUTION DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD | ARNETT, NICOLAS ALLEN | 3753 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 46d overdue | Pending | Jan 07, 2025 |
| 18069858 | MEDICAL FLUID INJECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD WITH REUSABLE PATCH | RADOMSKI, MARTIN ADAM | 3783 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 8d | Pending | Dec 21, 2022 |
| 16923612 | MEDICAL VIAL AND INJECTOR ASSEMBLIES AND METHODS OF USE | SCHMIDT, EMILY LOUISE | 3783 | §103 | Final Rejection | 86d overdue | Pending | Jul 08, 2020 |
| 16669810 | Pressurized Gas Powered Medicament Transfer And Re-Suspension Apparatus And Method | GOLLAMUDI, NEERAJA | 3783 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 27d | Pending | Oct 31, 2019 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial