Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Networking & Security
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Enbasis Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The concentration of the workload suggests that the company's current patenting activity is focused on a specific technical niche within the broader networking field, which may require specialized technical arguments.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is TRAN, TRANG U, who is responsible for the busiest examiner pending action. Because the busiest examiner pending count matches the total pending office actions, the portfolio's immediate administrative requirements are centralized under a centralized point of contact at the patent office. This concentration allows the applicant to focus resources on the specific examination style of TRAN, TRANG U within the assigned art unit. Such a focused workload simplifies the management of deadlines and examiner interviews for the pending portfolio. This focused approach may lead to a more predictable prosecution timeline.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRAN, TRANG U | 1 | 78.6% | +15.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18799048 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DRAIN AND PIPE CLEANING AND INSPECTION | TRAN, TRANG U | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18799048 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DRAIN AND PIPE CLEANING AND INSPECTION | TRAN, TRANG U | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2422 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18799048 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DRAIN AND PIPE CLEANING AND INSPECTION | TRAN, TRANG U | 2422 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial