Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Endoquest Robotics Inc.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Endoquest Robotics Inc. shows an active prosecution profile with 7 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are spread across 6 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, suggesting a wide-ranging set of patent applications. LUAN, SCOTT is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 2 busiest examiner pending office actions. The distribution of 7 pending office actions among 6 distinct examiners indicates that the company is engaging with a broad cross-section of the patent office's mechanical expertise.

With 5 distinct art units involved, the portfolio covers a variety of sub-technologies within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. LUAN, SCOTT holds a slightly higher concentration of the workload with 2 busiest examiner pending actions, while the remaining actions are handled by other individuals. This level of activity, involving 6 distinct examiners, requires a coordinated prosecution strategy to ensure consistency across the 7 pending office actions. For a practitioner, the high ratio of examiners to actions suggests that most matters are being handled independently, reducing the risk that a single examiner's bias will affect the entire portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (40%)
3
Medium (60%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (40%)
§102 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
80% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LUAN, SCOTT 2 65.6% +12.2%
CLARK, RYAN T 1 50.4% +18.2%
JOS, BASIL T 1 78.0% +6.3%
ABBASI, ABDUL HADI 1 0.0% +0.0%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18955892 DISPOSABLE END EFFECTORS CLARK, RYAN T —
18920441 USER INTERFACES FOR SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS LUAN, SCOTT —
18221037 SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR TRANS-LUMINAL INTRODUCTION OF A MEDICAL DEVICE ABBASI, ABDUL HADI —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18965829 WIRE ELONGATION COMPENSATION SYSTEM LUAN, SCOTT —
18955892 DISPOSABLE END EFFECTORS CLARK, RYAN T —
18920441 USER INTERFACES FOR SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS LUAN, SCOTT —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3792 2
3658 1
3795 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18965829 WIRE ELONGATION COMPENSATION SYSTEM LUAN, SCOTT 3792 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18955892 DISPOSABLE END EFFECTORS CLARK, RYAN T — §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18920441 USER INTERFACES FOR SURGICAL ROBOTIC SYSTEMS LUAN, SCOTT 3792 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 18, 2024
18781663 MASTER CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEMS JOS, BASIL T 3658 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jul 23, 2024
18221037 SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR TRANS-LUMINAL INTRODUCTION OF A MEDICAL DEVICE ABBASI, ABDUL HADI 3795 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 12, 2023

Managing Endoquest Robotics Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Endoquest Robotics Inc. have?

Endoquest Robotics Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 3 art units and 4 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Endoquest Robotics Inc. applications?

Scott Luan has the most, with 2 of Endoquest Robotics Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Endoquest Robotics Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month