Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Energy11 Co. Ltd. operates within the Chemistry & Materials technology area and currently has 2 pending office actions. These matters are assigned to 2 distinct examiners, which suggests that the company is managing multiple examination styles. The prosecution is also split across 2 distinct art units, indicating that the applications involve different technical classifications.
HANDVILLE, BRIAN is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. This means that the 2 pending office actions are shared between HANDVILLE, BRIAN and another official. For a practitioner, this distribution requires a strategy that accounts for the specific preferences of 2 distinct examiners.
The presence of 2 distinct art units suggests that the legal team must be prepared for different administrative guidelines. While HANDVILLE, BRIAN manages 1 busiest examiner pending action, the other pending matter is being reviewed in a separate art unit. This 2 to 2 ratio between actions and examiners ensures that no single individual dominates the company's current prosecution landscape.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANDVILLE, BRIAN | 1 | 51.3% | +28.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17295867 | COMPOSITE SOLID ELECTROLYTE SEPARATION MEMBRANE USING INORGANIC FIBER AND SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME | HANDVILLE, BRIAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17295867 | COMPOSITE SOLID ELECTROLYTE SEPARATION MEMBRANE USING INORGANIC FIBER AND SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME | HANDVILLE, BRIAN | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17295867 | COMPOSITE SOLID ELECTROLYTE SEPARATION MEMBRANE USING INORGANIC FIBER AND SECONDARY BATTERY USING THE SAME | HANDVILLE, BRIAN | 1783 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Mar 02, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialEnergy11 Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Brian Handville has the most, with 1 of Energy11 Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
