Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Epos Group A/S currently manages 1 pending office action. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a centralized prosecution landscape for the company's current filings. The presence of a pending matter suggests a focused or selective approach to their intellectual property strategy at this time. This concentration minimizes the administrative complexity of the current portfolio.
ROBINSON, RYAN C is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. Since this individual is the sole reviewer for the company's pending work, the prosecution outcome is dependent on their specific feedback and requirements. Practitioners should focus on the individual preferences of this examiner to effectively navigate the current office action and move the application toward allowance.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON, RYAN C | 1 | 78.4% | +14.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18896984 | HEADPHONE SEALING CUP | ROBINSON, RYAN C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18896984 | HEADPHONE SEALING CUP | ROBINSON, RYAN C | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18896984 | HEADPHONE SEALING CUP | ROBINSON, RYAN C | — | §102§103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial