Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ergomotion Inc. is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. With only 1 pending action, the company's prosecution is highly centralized. This single matter in 1 art unit indicates a focused technical review of the company's mechanical or e-commerce innovations within a specialized group at the patent office.
The concentration of the company's current prosecution under 1 distinct examiner allows for a direct and singular focus. EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT is the only individual at the patent office currently reviewing the company's pending work. This 1 pending office action is being evaluated within 1 distinct art unit, meaning the company must meet the specific technical requirements of that specialized group. Because there is only 1 action, the company's immediate patenting success depends on the outcome of this single review. This focused activity defines the present state of the company's interaction with the patent office.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SUN, GEORGE | 1 | 69.1% | +34.2% |
| EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT | 1 | 79.2% | +19.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913193 | PNEUMATIC SYSTEM FOR ADJUSTABLE SUPPORT | EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT | 32d overdue |
| 18941824 | ADJUSTABLE BED SYSTEM | SUN, GEORGE | 16d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18913193 | PNEUMATIC SYSTEM FOR ADJUSTABLE SUPPORT | EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT | 32d overdue |
| 18941824 | ADJUSTABLE BED SYSTEM | SUN, GEORGE | 16d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3673 | 2 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18941824 | ADJUSTABLE BED SYSTEM | SUN, GEORGE | 3673 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 16d overdue | Pending | Nov 08, 2024 |
| 18913193 | PNEUMATIC SYSTEM FOR ADJUSTABLE SUPPORT | EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT | 3673 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 32d overdue | Pending | Oct 11, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial