Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Esab AB

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 2 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Esab AB has 3 pending office actions currently active in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 3 pending office actions are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, which indicates that each pending matter is being handled by a different person. This workload is further divided across 2 distinct art units. Having 3 pending office actions in 2 distinct art units means that at least two of the actions are likely being processed within the same administrative division of the USPTO, potentially offering some consistency in broader policy application.

The busiest examiner for Esab AB is ING, MATTHEW W, who is managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 3 distinct examiners for the 3 pending office actions, the workload is evenly distributed. Practitioners should be prepared to navigate the specific requirements of 2 distinct art units while coordinating with 3 distinct examiners. The focus on Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems across these 3 pending office actions suggests a coherent technical strategy, even if the 3 distinct examiners introduce individual variability into the prosecution of the portfolio. This structure requires a strategy that accounts for the nuances of 2 distinct art units while responding to the individual preferences of 3 distinct examiners. The 1:1 ratio of examiners to pending actions ensures that each of the 3 pending office actions receives dedicated attention.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ING, MATTHEW W 1 64.7% +8.3%
CHOU, JIMMY 1 71.0% +14.9%
TRAN-LE, THAO UYEN 1 42.6% +48.6%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18804308 PALLET ING, MATTHEW W 41d
18476392 WIRE FEEDER TO TORCH COMMUNICATION CHOU, JIMMY —
17537644 ADAPTIVE INDUCTANCE COMPENSATION IN A WELDING CIRCUIT TRAN-LE, THAO UYEN —

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18476392 WIRE FEEDER TO TORCH COMMUNICATION CHOU, JIMMY —
17537644 ADAPTIVE INDUCTANCE COMPENSATION IN A WELDING CIRCUIT TRAN-LE, THAO UYEN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3637 1
3761 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18804308 PALLET ING, MATTHEW W 3637 §103§112 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Aug 14, 2024
18476392 WIRE FEEDER TO TORCH COMMUNICATION CHOU, JIMMY — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 28, 2023
17537644 ADAPTIVE INDUCTANCE COMPENSATION IN A WELDING CIRCUIT TRAN-LE, THAO UYEN 3761 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 30, 2021

Managing Esab AB's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month