Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

ESCO Group LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

ESCO Group LLC is currently managing 5 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These matters are distributed across 5 distinct examiners and 3 distinct art units, indicating a broad spread of examination across different USPTO departments. This lack of examiner overlap means that each of the pending actions is being reviewed by a different individual.

MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because each of the 5 pending actions is assigned to a different examiner, the company must navigate multiple examiner relationships simultaneously. This environment requires a high degree of coordination to ensure that arguments made in one application do not negatively impact the others, especially since they are spread across 3 distinct art units.

The distribution of actions across the specified art units suggests that the company's mechanical and transportation innovations are being classified into several different technical categories. This diversity in classification can affect the types of prior art cited and the overall difficulty of obtaining allowances. Practitioners should monitor the 5 distinct examiners closely, as the lack of a primary examiner for the portfolio prevents the consolidation of prosecution efforts.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LUSK, AUDREY L 2 68.7% +24.8%
MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE 1 73.5% +16.2%
XIAO, YUQING 1 60.3% +28.0%
HARTMANN, GARY S 1 72.7% +18.9%
SMITH, ISAAC G 1 72.5% +21.3%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17169302 PIN LOCK ASSEMBLY LUSK, AUDREY L 18d overdue
17686370 WEAR ASSEMBLY LUSK, AUDREY L 10d overdue
18516916 MATERIAL IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD XIAO, YUQING —
17991822 WEAR PART MONITORING SMITH, ISAAC G —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17169302 PIN LOCK ASSEMBLY LUSK, AUDREY L 18d overdue
17686370 WEAR ASSEMBLY LUSK, AUDREY L 10d overdue
18374465 MONITORING GROUND ENGAGING PRODUCTS FOR EARTH WORKING EQUIPMENT HARTMANN, GARY S 22d
18627302 LIP FOR EXCAVATING BUCKET MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE —
18516916 MATERIAL IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD XIAO, YUQING —
17991822 WEAR PART MONITORING SMITH, ISAAC G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3671 4
4100 1
3662 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18627302 LIP FOR EXCAVATING BUCKET MCGOWAN, JAMIE LOUISE 3671 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 04, 2024
18516916 MATERIAL IMAGING SYSTEM AND METHOD XIAO, YUQING 4100 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2023
18374465 MONITORING GROUND ENGAGING PRODUCTS FOR EARTH WORKING EQUIPMENT HARTMANN, GARY S 3671 §103 Final Rejection 22d Pending Sep 28, 2023
17991822 WEAR PART MONITORING SMITH, ISAAC G 3662 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2022
17686370 WEAR ASSEMBLY LUSK, AUDREY L 3671 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 10d overdue Pending Mar 03, 2022
17169302 PIN LOCK ASSEMBLY LUSK, AUDREY L 3671 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Feb 05, 2021

Managing ESCO Group LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month