Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Evital LLC maintains a focused prosecution profile in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The portfolio currently shows 1 pending office action, reflecting a streamlined set of active proceedings at the patent office. This single action is distributed across 1 distinct art unit, showing that the company's current filings are not spread across diverse technical classifications. For a practitioner, this indicates that the legal strategy can be narrowly tailored to the specific examination standards of this technical division.
The examiner JUNG, JONATHAN Y is identified as the busiest examiner for the firm, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner assigned to the portfolio's active matters, the outcome of the company's current prosecution cycle is centralized. This singular focus allows for a dedicated response strategy tailored to the specific requirements of the 1 art unit involved. The lack of diversification across multiple art units or examiners suggests that the company is prioritizing a specific semiconductor or circuit innovation at this stage of its intellectual property development.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JUNG, JONATHAN Y | 1 | 72.6% | +16.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18472951 | SELECTIVE COMMUNICATION USING MULTIPLE SEPARATED POLARIZERS | JUNG, JONATHAN Y | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18472951 | SELECTIVE COMMUNICATION USING MULTIPLE SEPARATED POLARIZERS | JUNG, JONATHAN Y | 26d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2871 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18472951 | SELECTIVE COMMUNICATION USING MULTIPLE SEPARATED POLARIZERS | JUNG, JONATHAN Y | 2871 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Sep 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial