Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Evonik Fibres GmbH

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Evonik Fibres GmbH has 2 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The matters involve 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, indicating separate examination settings for the pending work.

KETCHAM, HANNAH ELIZABETH is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. Counsel should evaluate each action independently while maintaining consistent terminology for the relevant fibre and materials technology. The limited assignment pattern supports focused response preparation and does not indicate a need for extensive examiner coordination.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KETCHAM, HANNAH ELIZABETH 1 — —
NGUYEN, HA S 1 58.5% -20.7%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18835597 CATALYTIC FIBERS AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF KETCHAM, HANNAH ELIZABETH —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1742 1
1766 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18835597 CATALYTIC FIBERS AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF KETCHAM, HANNAH ELIZABETH 1742 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 02, 2024
18542990 MELT-PROCESSABLE POLYIMIDES WITH HIGH GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE NGUYEN, HA S 1766 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 18, 2023

Managing Evonik Fibres GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Evonik Fibres GmbH have?

Evonik Fibres GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Evonik Fibres GmbH applications?

Hannah Elizabeth Ketcham has the most, with 1 of Evonik Fibres GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Evonik Fibres GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month