Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Faiveley Transport Rail Technologies India Private Limited is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's current patent prosecution involves 1 pending office action. This 1 matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a narrow scope of current activity. Such a focused workload allows for a dedicated approach to resolving the specific issues raised by the patent office.
The portfolio's pending work is situated within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that the company's current intellectual property challenges are concentrated in a specific regulatory environment. The lack of distribution across multiple units simplifies the administrative tracking of these proceedings and ensures that the prosecution strategy remains consistent with the specific practices of that 1 unit.
LIETHEN, KURT PHILIP is identified as the busiest examiner, with 1 pending office action under review. This individual is responsible for the only active office action in the portfolio. Prosecution success for the company presently hinges on the resolution of this specific examiner's requirements. The presence of 1 pending action for the busiest examiner indicates that no other examiners are currently managing pending matters for this portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LIETHEN, KURT PHILIP | 1 | 79.6% | +9.5% |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3747 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18705951 | ELECTRIC BAKE CONTROL SYSTEM | LIETHEN, KURT PHILIP | 3747 | §103 | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Apr 29, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial