Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
7 pending office actions • 3 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Fastbrick Ip Pty Ltd. is managing 7 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 7 actions are assigned to 7 distinct examiners. The prosecution is distributed across 3 distinct art units.
Spencer D Patton is the busiest examiner for the company, handling 1 pending office action. Each of the 7 distinct examiners has 1 pending action, creating a distributed workload. The involvement of 3 distinct art units indicates that while the examiners are all different, they are grouped into a smaller number of technical classifications. This structure suggests that the company's mechanical systems research is focused enough to stay within 3 distinct art units but involves 7 distinct examiners. Practitioners should be prepared for a variety of examiner perspectives across these 7 pending office actions. The 7 distinct examiners provide a broad range of individual review styles within the 3 distinct art units. This distribution means that no single examiner's style dominates the current prosecution of the 7 pending office actions.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (14%) |
| §102 only | 1 (14%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 5 (71%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATTON, SPENCER D | 1 | 74.1% | +21.1% |
| HOLWERDA, STEPHEN | 1 | 73.2% | +19.8% |
| MAWARI, REDHWAN K | 1 | 72.5% | +26.9% |
| CAIN, AARON G | 1 | 43.2% | +29.5% |
| CULLEN, TANNER L | 1 | 71.8% | +16.2% |
| ADAMS, GREGORY W | 1 | 75.2% | +23.8% |
| SADLON, JOSEPH | 1 | 63.4% | +26.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18952574 | PATH CORRECTION FOR END EFFECTOR CONTROL | CULLEN, TANNER L | 14d |
| 18973870 | VIRTUAL ROBOT BASE | CAIN, AARON G | 16d |
| 19080011 | INTERACTION SYSTEM CONFIGURATION | PATTON, SPENCER D | — |
| 18878379 | CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL DELIVERY | MAWARI, REDHWAN K | — |
| 18857337 | ROBOTIC BLOCK LAYING MACHINE IMPROVEMENTS | ADAMS, GREGORY W | — |
| 18723098 | BLOCK FOR USE IN AUTOMATED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION | SADLON, JOSEPH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18952574 | PATH CORRECTION FOR END EFFECTOR CONTROL | CULLEN, TANNER L | 14d |
| 18973870 | VIRTUAL ROBOT BASE | CAIN, AARON G | 16d |
| 19080011 | INTERACTION SYSTEM CONFIGURATION | PATTON, SPENCER D | — |
| 18878395 | CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL WORKING | HOLWERDA, STEPHEN | — |
| 18878379 | CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL DELIVERY | MAWARI, REDHWAN K | — |
| 18857337 | ROBOTIC BLOCK LAYING MACHINE IMPROVEMENTS | ADAMS, GREGORY W | — |
| 18723098 | BLOCK FOR USE IN AUTOMATED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION | SADLON, JOSEPH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3656 | 3 |
| 3635 | 2 |
| 3652 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19080011 | INTERACTION SYSTEM CONFIGURATION | PATTON, SPENCER D | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 14, 2025 |
| 18878395 | CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL WORKING | HOLWERDA, STEPHEN | 3656 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
| 18878379 | CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL DELIVERY | MAWARI, REDHWAN K | 3652 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 23, 2024 |
| 18973870 | VIRTUAL ROBOT BASE | CAIN, AARON G | 3656 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | 16d | Pending | Dec 09, 2024 |
| 18952574 | PATH CORRECTION FOR END EFFECTOR CONTROL | CULLEN, TANNER L | 3656 | §101§102§103Other | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Nov 19, 2024 |
| 18857337 | ROBOTIC BLOCK LAYING MACHINE IMPROVEMENTS | ADAMS, GREGORY W | 3635 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 16, 2024 |
| 18723098 | BLOCK FOR USE IN AUTOMATED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION | SADLON, JOSEPH | 3635 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial