Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Fedegari Autoclavi S P A currently manages 2 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are distributed among 2 distinct examiners, providing different perspectives on the company's patent applications. Zakaria Elahmadi is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing 1 pending office action. The prosecution is further localized within 1 distinct art unit.
For a practitioner, the distribution of actions across different examiners suggests that the portfolio is not dependent on a single individual's interpretation. The focus on the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area indicates a specialized technical direction. Because a distinct art unit is involved, the company may encounter consistent examination standards, which requires a coordinated prosecution approach.
Managing the distinct examiners requires a proactive approach to ensure that responses are aligned with the overall strategic goals of the company. Practitioners should analyze the allowance rates and prosecution timelines for each assigned examiner to better predict the outcomes for these pending matters. This approach helps in navigating the complexities of the mechanical patent landscape where examiner discretion can be significant. Maintaining a unified legal position across different examiners is essential for a strong intellectual property portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA | 1 | 76.0% | +11.9% |
| SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T | 1 | 79.2% | +0.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18553555 | Decontamination Machine and Catalyser Device for the Treatment of Chemical Vapours | SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18578968 | AUTOMATIC COUPLING DEVICE | ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA | 38d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3618 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18578968 | AUTOMATIC COUPLING DEVICE | ELAHMADI, ZAKARIA | 3618 | §103 | Final Rejection | 38d overdue | Pending | Jan 12, 2024 |
| 18553555 | Decontamination Machine and Catalyser Device for the Treatment of Chemical Vapours | SEIFU, LESSANEWORK T | — | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 30, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial