Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovação Tecnológica S A

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Networking & Security

10 pending office actions • 10 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovaçâo Tecnológica S A manages a company patent portfolio in the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio currently has 10 pending office actions. These actions are distributed among 10 distinct examiners and 10 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio of actions to examiners and art units indicates a high degree of technical and procedural diversity in the company's current prosecution.

The busiest examiner for this portfolio is BENGZON, GREG C, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. With 10 pending office actions and 10 distinct examiners, no single examiner holds a majority of the workload. The fact that each action is in a different art unit suggests that the company's software technology spans a wide range of sub-disciplines within the USPTO. For a practitioner, this requires managing ten separate prosecution tracks, each with its own unique examiner and art unit standards. This diversity prevents the company from relying on a single point of contact and necessitates a highly versatile approach to patent strategy across the computing sector. Success depends on adapting to 10 distinct art unit environments.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (60%)
4
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (30%)
§101 + other1 (10%)
§103 only3 (30%)
§102 only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
10
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BENGZON, GREG C 1 57.3% +10.1%
SKHOUN, HICHAM 1 77.1% +5.5%
CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 1 41.9% +35.7%
BAKER, EZRA JAMES 1 42.9% +20.5%
AHSAN, SYED M 1 73.4% +22.1%
NYE, LOUIS CHRISTOPHER 1 26.7% +31.8%
STARKS, WILBERT L 1 74.7% +3.3%
ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 1 75.6% +14.6%
STORK, KYLE R 1 63.2% +28.7%
KWON, JUN 1 42.0% +43.4%

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18522773 METHOD FOR GENERATING TEXTUAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR A DATA CHART AND ENHANCING NAVIGABILITY ON GRAPHICAL INTERFACES CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 86d overdue
16667696 EXPLANATION REPORTING BASED ON DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN ITEMS IN DIFFERENT DATA GROUPS KWON, JUN 5d overdue
17500310 MODEL-AGNOSTIC APPROACH TO INTERPRETING SEQUENCE PREDICTIONS STARKS, WILBERT L 34d
17331501 ACTIVE LEARNING ANNOTATION SYSTEM THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE HISTORICAL DATA STORK, KYLE R 70d
18507568 METHOD FOR FAIRNESS-AWARE DATA VALUATION PROCESSING FOR SUPERVISED LEARNING BAKER, EZRA JAMES —
17891981 SELF-SUPERVISED FRAMEWORK FOR GRAPH REPRESENTATION LEARNING NYE, LOUIS CHRISTOPHER —
17386291 AUTOMATED FEATURE MONITORING FOR DATA STREAMS ALLEN, NICHOLAS E —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18522773 METHOD FOR GENERATING TEXTUAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR A DATA CHART AND ENHANCING NAVIGABILITY ON GRAPHICAL INTERFACES CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 86d overdue
16667696 EXPLANATION REPORTING BASED ON DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN ITEMS IN DIFFERENT DATA GROUPS KWON, JUN 5d overdue
18345626 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SECURING AN ONLINE CLIENT-SERVER SESSION BETWEEN A CLIENT DEVICE AND A SERVER DEVICE BY APPLICATION OF AT LEAST A COUNTERMEASURE AHSAN, SYED M 20d
17331501 ACTIVE LEARNING ANNOTATION SYSTEM THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE HISTORICAL DATA STORK, KYLE R 70d
19216988 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR MONITORING A COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR ACCOUNT AND/OR SESSION SECURITY ATTACKS, AND COMPUTER SYSTEM THEREOF BENGZON, GREG C —
18507568 METHOD FOR FAIRNESS-AWARE DATA VALUATION PROCESSING FOR SUPERVISED LEARNING BAKER, EZRA JAMES —
17891981 SELF-SUPERVISED FRAMEWORK FOR GRAPH REPRESENTATION LEARNING NYE, LOUIS CHRISTOPHER —
17386291 AUTOMATED FEATURE MONITORING FOR DATA STREAMS ALLEN, NICHOLAS E —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2444 1
2164 1
2171 1
2126 1
2491 1
2141 1
2122 1
2154 1
2128 1
2127 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19216988 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR MONITORING A COMPUTER SYSTEM FOR ACCOUNT AND/OR SESSION SECURITY ATTACKS, AND COMPUTER SYSTEM THEREOF BENGZON, GREG C 2444 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2025
18989655 GRAPH SEARCH AND VISUALIZATION FOR FRAUDULENT TRANSACTION ANALYSIS SKHOUN, HICHAM 2164 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18522773 METHOD FOR GENERATING TEXTUAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR A DATA CHART AND ENHANCING NAVIGABILITY ON GRAPHICAL INTERFACES CALDERON SANTIAGO, ALVARO RAFAEL 2171 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 86d overdue Pending Nov 29, 2023
18507568 METHOD FOR FAIRNESS-AWARE DATA VALUATION PROCESSING FOR SUPERVISED LEARNING BAKER, EZRA JAMES 2126 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2023
18345626 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SECURING AN ONLINE CLIENT-SERVER SESSION BETWEEN A CLIENT DEVICE AND A SERVER DEVICE BY APPLICATION OF AT LEAST A COUNTERMEASURE AHSAN, SYED M 2491 §102 Final Rejection 20d Pending Jun 30, 2023
17891981 SELF-SUPERVISED FRAMEWORK FOR GRAPH REPRESENTATION LEARNING NYE, LOUIS CHRISTOPHER 2141 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 19, 2022
17500310 MODEL-AGNOSTIC APPROACH TO INTERPRETING SEQUENCE PREDICTIONS STARKS, WILBERT L 2122 §101 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Oct 13, 2021
17386291 AUTOMATED FEATURE MONITORING FOR DATA STREAMS ALLEN, NICHOLAS E 2154 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 27, 2021
17331501 ACTIVE LEARNING ANNOTATION SYSTEM THAT DOES NOT REQUIRE HISTORICAL DATA STORK, KYLE R 2128 §101 Final Rejection 70d Pending May 26, 2021
16667696 EXPLANATION REPORTING BASED ON DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN ITEMS IN DIFFERENT DATA GROUPS KWON, JUN 2127 §101 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Oct 29, 2019

Managing Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovação Tecnológica S A's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovação Tecnológica S A have?

Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovação Tecnológica S A has 10 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 10 art units and 10 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovação Tecnológica S A applications?

Greg C Bengzon has the most, with 1 of Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovação Tecnológica S A's pending office actions.

What technology area are Feedzai - Consultadoria E Inovação Tecnológica S A's patent applications in?

Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month