Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days
Fidlock GmbH currently manages 1 pending office action within its patent portfolio. This single matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, indicating a concentrated prosecution environment at this stage. The busiest examiner for the portfolio is LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW, who is responsible for the 1 pending office action. This concentration allows for a direct and singular focus on the requirements of the individual examiner involved.
Prosecution is currently limited to 0 distinct art units, reflecting a narrow focus for the company's active patent matters. With only 1 examiner and 1 pending action, the company's current interactions with the patent office are highly individualized. Practitioners should focus on the specific feedback from LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW to advance this single pending matter. The absence of multiple art units or examiners simplifies the prosecution strategy for the company's current active portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW | 1 | 56.5% | +22.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18877303 | Holding Apparatus for Holding an Object on an Assembly | LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18877303 | Holding Apparatus for Holding an Object on an Assembly | LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18877303 | Holding Apparatus for Holding an Object on an Assembly | LARSON, JUSTIN MATTHEW | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 20, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial