Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.

9 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 33 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 9 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
9
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only9 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
89% of docket
1
Communications
11% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS R 2 76.9% +10.5%
MIDKIFF, AARON 1 49.9% +23.9%
RAHMAN, SHAH M 1 80.9% +25.9%
JARRETT, RYAN A 1 80.7% +7.7%
ANYIKIRE, CHIKAODILI E 1 74.9% +11.5%
FIBBI, CHRISTOPHER J 1 53.0% +38.1%
ELL, MATTHEW 1 66.4% +22.7%
PEACH, POLINA G 1 50.0% +23.6%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18375727 Automated Recipe Generation JARRETT, RYAN A 87d overdue
18480036 Gateway for Facilitating Control System Upgrades RAHMAN, SHAH M 61d

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18370691 COMPUTE FABRIC ENABLED PROCESS CONTROL ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS R 43d overdue
17836624 VISUALIZSATION OF A SOFTWARE DEFINED PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS PLANTS FIBBI, CHRISTOPHER J 11d overdue
17954307 GENERAL REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS MONITORING AND ANOMALY/ FAULT DETECTION ANYIKIRE, CHIKAODILI E 3d overdue
16874778 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES IN A GRAPHICAL DISPLAY CONFIGURATION ELL, MATTHEW 8d
18763142 Rapid Display Prototyping and Creation Using Gestures MIDKIFF, AARON 14d
14843323 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A PROCESS PLANT WITH WEARABLE MOBILE CONTROL DEVICES PEACH, POLINA G 23d
18223384 Process Control or Automation System Architecture ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS R 28d
18480036 Gateway for Facilitating Control System Upgrades RAHMAN, SHAH M 61d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2119 2
2621 1
2413 1
2116 1
2487 1
2174 1
2141 1
2165 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18763142 Rapid Display Prototyping and Creation Using Gestures MIDKIFF, AARON 2621 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jul 03, 2024
18480036 Gateway for Facilitating Control System Upgrades RAHMAN, SHAH M 2413 §103 Final Rejection 61d Pending Oct 03, 2023
18375727 Automated Recipe Generation JARRETT, RYAN A 2116 §103 Non-Final OA 87d overdue Pending Oct 02, 2023
18370691 COMPUTE FABRIC ENABLED PROCESS CONTROL ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS R 2119 §103 Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Sep 20, 2023
18223384 Process Control or Automation System Architecture ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ, CARLOS R 2119 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jul 18, 2023
17954307 GENERAL REINFORCEMENT LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR PROCESS MONITORING AND ANOMALY/ FAULT DETECTION ANYIKIRE, CHIKAODILI E 2487 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Sep 27, 2022
17836624 VISUALIZSATION OF A SOFTWARE DEFINED PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESS PLANTS FIBBI, CHRISTOPHER J 2174 §103 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending Jun 09, 2022
16874778 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES IN A GRAPHICAL DISPLAY CONFIGURATION ELL, MATTHEW 2141 §103 Non-Final OA 8d Pending May 15, 2020
14843323 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A PROCESS PLANT WITH WEARABLE MOBILE CONTROL DEVICES PEACH, POLINA G 2165 §103 Final Rejection 23d Pending Sep 02, 2015

Managing Fisher-Rosemount Systems Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month