Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 2 (67%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELCHANTI, ZEINA | 1 | 64.1% | +25.0% |
| MAHROUKA, WASSIM | 1 | 85.8% | +7.9% |
| BAHL, SANGEETA | 1 | 20.6% | +19.7% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18605407 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION | MAHROUKA, WASSIM | 62d |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18919016 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INFORMATION PROCESSING | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | — |
| 18295607 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION | BAHL, SANGEETA | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18919016 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INFORMATION PROCESSING | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | — |
| 18295607 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION | BAHL, SANGEETA | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3628 | 1 |
| 2665 | 1 |
| 3626 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18919016 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INFORMATION PROCESSING | ELCHANTI, ZEINA | 3628 | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 17, 2024 |
| 18605407 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION | MAHROUKA, WASSIM | 2665 | §103DPOther | Non-Final OA | 62d | Pending | Mar 14, 2024 |
| 18295607 | INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION | BAHL, SANGEETA | 3626 | §101 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 04, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial