Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Geneneer Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit. This structure indicates a narrow and specific focus for the company's current patent applications. The concentration in 1 art unit suggests that the technical subject matter is specialized within the broader biotechnology field.
ZHENG, LI is the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending office action. This action constitutes the total pending workload for the portfolio. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, the company's current prosecution outcomes are dependent on this examiner's evaluation. This concentrated activity allows for a targeted approach to the USPTO, but it also increases the impact of this individual examiner's decisions. Practitioners must tailor their arguments specifically to the preferences of ZHENG, LI, as there are no other pending actions to balance the results of this interaction.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZHENG, LI | 1 | 83.6% | +12.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1662 | 1 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial