Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Genhealth Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. Nicholas A Akogyeram II is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, overseeing the 1 pending office action. The company's current prosecution is focused on a single point of contact at the USPTO.
The 1 pending office action represents the current workload in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area. With 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved, the examination is confined to a specific technical group. Nicholas A Akogyeram II handles the 1 pending office action, making him the primary examiner for the company's active matters. This concentration means that the prosecution results are tied to the findings of this single individual.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AKOGYERAM II, NICHOLAS A | 1 | 26.7% | +29.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19061922 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ARCHITECTURE FOR PROVIDING LONGITUDINAL HEALTH RECORD PREDICTIONS | AKOGYERAM II, NICHOLAS A | 40d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19061922 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ARCHITECTURE FOR PROVIDING LONGITUDINAL HEALTH RECORD PREDICTIONS | AKOGYERAM II, NICHOLAS A | 40d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3686 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19061922 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ARCHITECTURE FOR PROVIDING LONGITUDINAL HEALTH RECORD PREDICTIONS | AKOGYERAM II, NICHOLAS A | 3686 | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | 40d | Pending | Feb 24, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial