Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

George Tfe Scp

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

George Tfe Scp currently has 3 pending office actions in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These matters are handled by 2 distinct examiners and are concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. The busiest examiner, MORAN, KATHERINE M, is responsible for 2 pending office actions. This means that 2 of the 3 pending office actions are under the review of a single individual.

Because all 3 pending office actions are in the same art unit, the company likely faces very consistent examination standards and prior art landscapes. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the specific rejection style of MORAN, KATHERINE M, as this examiner controls the majority of the active docket. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit allows for a more unified prosecution strategy compared to more diversified portfolios.

With only 2 distinct examiners involved, the company can focus its resources on a very small number of individual perspectives. The 3 pending office actions represent a narrow but concentrated effort in the medical device sector. Counsel should leverage the feedback from the 2 pending office actions assigned to MORAN, KATHERINE M to inform the strategy for the remaining case in the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (33%)
1
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting only1 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MORAN, KATHERINE M 2 54.3% +24.2%
HOEY, ALISSA L 1 44.4% +32.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18264218 CELLULAR ENERGY-ABSORBING STRUCTURE FASTENING DEVICE MORAN, KATHERINE M —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19157364 HELMET HOEY, ALISSA L 69d
18264218 CELLULAR ENERGY-ABSORBING STRUCTURE FASTENING DEVICE MORAN, KATHERINE M —
18264212 CELLULAR ENERGY-ABSORBING STRUCTURE FASTENING DEVICE MORAN, KATHERINE M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3732 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19157364 HELMET HOEY, ALISSA L 3732 §103Other Final Rejection 69d Pending Aug 17, 2025
18264218 CELLULAR ENERGY-ABSORBING STRUCTURE FASTENING DEVICE MORAN, KATHERINE M 3732 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Aug 03, 2023
18264212 CELLULAR ENERGY-ABSORBING STRUCTURE FASTENING DEVICE MORAN, KATHERINE M 3732 DP Final Rejection — Pending Aug 03, 2023

Managing George Tfe Scp's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does George Tfe Scp have?

George Tfe Scp has 3 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most George Tfe Scp applications?

Katherine M Moran has the most, with 2 of George Tfe Scp's pending office actions.

What technology area are George Tfe Scp's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month