Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Geotab Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

15 pending office actions • 10 art units • 15 examiners • 0 of 15 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 53 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Geotab Inc. is currently managing 14 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 14 pending office actions are assigned to 14 distinct examiners, resulting in a ratio of 14 examiners to 14 actions. The prosecution spans 9 distinct art units, indicating that the company's innovations are reviewed by several different specialized groups. AHN, HYANG is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing 1 pending action. This distribution shows a decentralized prosecution landscape where no examiner handles more than 1 case for the company.

For a patent practitioner, the presence of 14 pending office actions across 9 distinct art units requires a strategy that can adapt to the varying standards of different examination groups. With 14 distinct examiners involved, the company's patent prospects are spread across a wide range of individuals, which may lead to a variety of prosecution outcomes. AHN, HYANG, as the busiest examiner with 1 pending action, represents the standard for this portfolio where every case has a unique examiner. This lack of concentration across 9 distinct art units suggests that the company's innovations in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector are technically diverse, requiring a broad range of expertise from the 14 distinct examiners assigned to the cases.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

15
Total Pending OAs
10
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (53%)
7
Medium (47%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (7%)
§101 + other5 (33%)
§103 only7 (47%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (13%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
2
Information Tech
13% of docket
1
Communications
7% of docket
2
Semiconductors
13% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
4
Business / Other
27% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

150 h
Manual time on pending OAs
30 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
52 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHN, HYANG 1 87.5% +25.0%
CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT 1 66.5% +48.9%
TO, TUAN C 1 86.1% +10.0%
JOSEPH, TONYA S 1 24.1% +19.3%
MOREAU, AUSTIN J 1 77.7% +28.0%
DORAISWAMY, RANJIT P 1 64.1% +41.0%
FRANKLIN, RICHARD B 1 83.4% +0.6%
SANTOS, DANIEL JOSEPH 1 71.4% +32.8%
FRAZIER, BRADY W 1 78.4% +27.3%
LOTTER, DAVID E 1 84.8% +9.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19240684 CHARACTERIZING A VEHICLE COLLISION TO, TUAN C —

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19175111 Methods for Shared Vehicle Access JOSEPH, TONYA S 23d overdue
18905435 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING VEHICLE SERVICE CENTERS ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 27d
18636836 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING VEHICLE STOP ZONES KHATIB, RAMI 53d
18646134 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PLANNING A ROUTE USING OPERATOR SAFETY SCORES AND IDENTIFIED HAZARDOUS ZONES AS FACTORS TALLMAN, BRIAN A 68d
19407364 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING COMMERCIAL DOMICILES AHN, HYANG —
19273867 SNAP TO ROAD, POPULAR ROUTES, POPULAR STOPS, PREDICTING ROADWAY SPEED, AND CONTIGUOUS REGION IDENTIFICATION CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT —
19037537 INTELLIGENT BLUETOOTH BEACON I/O EXPANSION SYSTEM FRANKLIN, RICHARD B —
18936065 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR TRIP DETECTION IN AN ASSET TRACKER FRAZIER, BRADY W —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19175111 Methods for Shared Vehicle Access JOSEPH, TONYA S 23d overdue
19052778 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RETRIEVING TELEMATICS DATA DORAISWAMY, RANJIT P 41d
19407364 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING COMMERCIAL DOMICILES AHN, HYANG —
19273867 SNAP TO ROAD, POPULAR ROUTES, POPULAR STOPS, PREDICTING ROADWAY SPEED, AND CONTIGUOUS REGION IDENTIFICATION CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT —
19240684 CHARACTERIZING A VEHICLE COLLISION TO, TUAN C —
19081180 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING VEHICLE-RELATED IMAGE DATA MOREAU, AUSTIN J —
18960389 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA FOR VEHICLES SANTOS, DANIEL JOSEPH —
18936065 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR TRIP DETECTION IN AN ASSET TRACKER FRAZIER, BRADY W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3628 2
3661 1
2685 1
2166 1
2181 1
2845 1
3629 1
3669 1
3667 1
2859 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19407364 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING COMMERCIAL DOMICILES AHN, HYANG 3661 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 03, 2025
19273867 SNAP TO ROAD, POPULAR ROUTES, POPULAR STOPS, PREDICTING ROADWAY SPEED, AND CONTIGUOUS REGION IDENTIFICATION CHALHOUB, JEFFREY ROBERT — §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 18, 2025
19240684 CHARACTERIZING A VEHICLE COLLISION TO, TUAN C — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 17, 2025
19175111 Methods for Shared Vehicle Access JOSEPH, TONYA S 3628 §103 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Apr 10, 2025
19081180 SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS FOR COMMUNICATING VEHICLE-RELATED IMAGE DATA MOREAU, AUSTIN J 2685 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 17, 2025
19052778 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR RETRIEVING TELEMATICS DATA DORAISWAMY, RANJIT P 2166 §103 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Feb 13, 2025
19037537 INTELLIGENT BLUETOOTH BEACON I/O EXPANSION SYSTEM FRANKLIN, RICHARD B 2181 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 27, 2025
18960389 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SEGMENTED IMAGE DATA FOR VEHICLES SANTOS, DANIEL JOSEPH — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18936065 METHODS AND DEVICES FOR TRIP DETECTION IN AN ASSET TRACKER FRAZIER, BRADY W — §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 04, 2024
18913480 MULTI-BAND ANTENNA DEVICE AND TUNING TECHNIQUES LOTTER, DAVID E 2845 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18905435 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING VEHICLE SERVICE CENTERS ARAQUE JR, GERARDO 3629 §101§103 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Oct 03, 2024
18646134 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PLANNING A ROUTE USING OPERATOR SAFETY SCORES AND IDENTIFIED HAZARDOUS ZONES AS FACTORS TALLMAN, BRIAN A 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection 68d Pending Apr 25, 2024
18636836 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING VEHICLE STOP ZONES KHATIB, RAMI 3669 §101§103 Non-Final OA 53d Pending Apr 16, 2024
18537014 Methods for Action Trigger Management in a Telematics Device KRESS, TABITHA LYNN 3667 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2023
17530896 METHODS FOR CONTROLLING POWER DISTRIBUTION TO VEHICLES JEPPSON, PAMELA J 2859 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 19, 2021

Managing Geotab Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month