Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Global Post Graystone Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is distributed to 1 distinct examiner. The prosecution landscape for the company is currently limited to 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specific technical focus for their active intellectual property pursuits.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SKAIST, AVI T., who is currently managing 1 busiest examiner pending action. This count of 1 busiest examiner pending action represents the entirety of the 1 pending office action currently active for the company. Such a focused workload means that the outcome of the company's current prosecution depends on the decisions of this 1 distinct examiner within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
The involvement of the 1 distinct art unit and the 1 busiest examiner pending action assigned to SKAIST, AVI T. indicates a lack of diversity in the examination process at this time. Practitioners can expect a singular examination style as they navigate the 1 pending office action. This concentration simplifies the tracking of pending matters but also increases the impact of the specific examiner's tendencies on the overall portfolio.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SKAIST, AVI T. | 1 | 64.2% | +42.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19074661 | ACOUSTIC STIMULATION | SKAIST, AVI T. | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3674 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19074661 | ACOUSTIC STIMULATION | SKAIST, AVI T. | 3674 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 10, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial