Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
5 pending office actions • 5 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Glydways Inc. currently has 5 pending office actions. These 5 pending office actions are categorized within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution involves 5 distinct examiners. This distribution across 5 distinct examiners indicates that each pending case is handled by a different individual.
The work is organized into 5 distinct art units. These 5 distinct art units are part of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. INSERRA, MADISON RENEE is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. The 1 pending office action is one of the cases currently under review at the patent office.
The 5 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units provide the technical review for the portfolio. Practitioners should monitor the 5 pending office actions for consistent prosecution results across the different examiners. The Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area remains the focus for these filings. INSERRA, MADISON RENEE and the other examiners handle the ongoing prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (40%) |
| §102 only | 1 (20%) |
| §112 only | 1 (20%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (20%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| INSERRA, MADISON RENEE | 1 | 70.1% | +34.8% |
| ISMAIL, OMAR S | 1 | 91.3% | +9.9% |
| CAMBY, RICHARD M | 1 | 89.2% | +6.5% |
| REFAI, RAMSEY | 1 | 50.7% | +12.6% |
| MCCLEARY, CAITLIN RENEE | 1 | 59.7% | +26.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18826020 | VARIABLE BANDWIDTH FREE-SPACE OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS OR SEMI-AUTONOMOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES | ISMAIL, OMAR S | — |
| 18671879 | TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM | CAMBY, RICHARD M | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19288823 | VEHICLE TRAJECTORY PRIORITIZATION IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SYSTEM | INSERRA, MADISON RENEE | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18387786 | TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES | MCCLEARY, CAITLIN RENEE | 5d overdue |
| 18617388 | AUTONOMOUS RAIL OR OFF RAIL VEHICLE MOVEMENT AND SYSTEM AMONG A GROUP OF VEHICLES | REFAI, RAMSEY | 14d |
| 19288823 | VEHICLE TRAJECTORY PRIORITIZATION IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SYSTEM | INSERRA, MADISON RENEE | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3662 | 1 |
| 2635 | 1 |
| 3661 | 1 |
| 3664 | 1 |
| 3669 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19288823 | VEHICLE TRAJECTORY PRIORITIZATION IN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE SYSTEM | INSERRA, MADISON RENEE | 3662 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 01, 2025 |
| 18826020 | VARIABLE BANDWIDTH FREE-SPACE OPTICAL COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS OR SEMI-AUTONOMOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES | ISMAIL, OMAR S | 2635 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 05, 2024 |
| 18671879 | TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM | CAMBY, RICHARD M | 3661 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 22, 2024 |
| 18617388 | AUTONOMOUS RAIL OR OFF RAIL VEHICLE MOVEMENT AND SYSTEM AMONG A GROUP OF VEHICLES | REFAI, RAMSEY | 3664 | §112 | Final Rejection | 14d | Pending | Mar 26, 2024 |
| 18387786 | TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES | MCCLEARY, CAITLIN RENEE | 3669 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Nov 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialGlydways Inc. has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 5 examiners.
Madison Renee Inserra has the most, with 1 of Glydways Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
