Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Grand Force Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This structure reflects a focused prosecution effort with no current dispersion across different technical groups or personnel.
MALIK, VIPUL is the busiest examiner, overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This matter represents the total 1 pending office action for the portfolio. The use of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for this single action indicates a centralized prosecution. For the company, this means that their immediate success in the chemistry and materials sector is tied to the review of this specific examiner within their assigned art unit, allowing for a targeted legal strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALIK, VIPUL | 1 | 62.1% | +35.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19187997 | LAYERED MOLD FOR DECORATIVE SHEET | MALIK, VIPUL | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19187997 | LAYERED MOLD FOR DECORATIVE SHEET | MALIK, VIPUL | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1754 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19187997 | LAYERED MOLD FOR DECORATIVE SHEET | MALIK, VIPUL | 1754 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 24, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial