Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Greenheck Fan Corporation

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Greenheck Fan Corporation has 1 pending office action currently active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This matter is being handled by CHRISTENSEN, DANIELLE M, who is the busiest examiner for the company with 1 pending case. The prosecution is localized within a single art unit, reflecting a narrow and specific technical focus for the current workload.

With only a single distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate patent strategy is entirely dependent on the interactions within this individual relationship. The presence of a single pending action suggests a low-volume or highly efficient prosecution phase at this time. Practitioners should focus on the specific procedural history of this examiner to resolve the outstanding office action. The alignment of the art unit and examiner suggests a consistent environment for this specific mechanical engineering matter. This consistency allows the company to tailor its technical arguments to a very specific set of examination criteria.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHRISTENSEN, DANIELLE M 1 79.4% +11.3%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19273995 THREE-DIMENSIONAL AIRFOIL AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION CHRISTENSEN, DANIELLE M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3745 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19273995 THREE-DIMENSIONAL AIRFOIL AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION CHRISTENSEN, DANIELLE M 3745 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 18, 2025

Managing Greenheck Fan Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month