Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co. Ltd.

6 pending office actions • 6 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 34 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (83%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (67%)
§102 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
17% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
83% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MAI, TRI M 1 36.1% +21.0%
FLORES SANCHEZ, OMAR 1 73.7% +14.5%
ING, MATTHEW W 1 64.8% +7.6%
POON, DANA LEE 1 53.6% +44.1%
PERREAULT, ANDREW D 1 46.5% +18.6%
PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R 1 41.4% +24.3%

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17790512 Knife PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R 408d overdue
18208891 STACKING SYSTEM PERREAULT, ANDREW D 5d
18893448 CUTTING TOOL FLORES SANCHEZ, OMAR 22d
18453465 DRAIN CLOG REMOVER POON, DANA LEE 35d
18975433 STACKING SYSTEM MAI, TRI M 56d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3733 1
3724 1
3637 1
3723 1
3735 1
2178 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18975433 STACKING SYSTEM MAI, TRI M 3733 §102 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Dec 10, 2024
18893448 CUTTING TOOL FLORES SANCHEZ, OMAR 3724 §112 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Sep 23, 2024
18884606 BRACKET ASSEMBLY AND STORAGE RACK SYSTEM ING, MATTHEW W 3637 §103 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Sep 13, 2024
18453465 DRAIN CLOG REMOVER POON, DANA LEE 3723 §103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Aug 22, 2023
18208891 STACKING SYSTEM PERREAULT, ANDREW D 3735 §103 Non-Final OA 5d Pending Jun 13, 2023
17790512 Knife PULLIAM, CHRISTYANN R 2178 §103 Non-Final OA 408d overdue Pending Jul 03, 2022

Managing Hangzhou Great Star Industrial Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month