Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Harbin Intitute Of Technology is active in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area with 1 pending office action currently recorded. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a focused point of contact within the patent office. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests the institute's mechanical technology falls under a specific specialized classification. This concentration of activity in a single unit simplifies the administrative tracking for the portfolio at this stage.
The busiest examiner for the institute is ULATOWSKI, EMMA ELIZABETH, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions is also 1, this examiner is responsible for the entirety of the institute's current workload. Practitioners should note that the outcome of the current prosecution efforts depends entirely on the interaction with this one individual. The presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit indicates a very targeted technical focus for the institute's current filings. The results of this 1 pending office action will be the primary indicator of success in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ULATOWSKI, EMMA ELIZABETH | 1 | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18685461 | ULTRAFAST LASER PROCESSING METHOD FOR FLEXIBLE DOUBLE-SIDED ELECTRODES | ULATOWSKI, EMMA ELIZABETH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3761 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18685461 | ULTRAFAST LASER PROCESSING METHOD FOR FLEXIBLE DOUBLE-SIDED ELECTRODES | ULATOWSKI, EMMA ELIZABETH | 3761 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialHarbin Intitute Of Technology has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Emma Elizabeth Ulatowski has the most, with 1 of Harbin Intitute Of Technology's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
