Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Healtech Pty Ltd. manages a company patent portfolio within the Computing & Software technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action, which is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner. This indicates a very specific and singular focus for the company's current patent prosecution efforts. All active legal proceedings are contained within 1 distinct art unit, suggesting that the pending intellectual property is concentrated in a single technical niche. This concentration allows for a streamlined approach to addressing examiner concerns.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM, who is tasked with 1 pending office action. As this is the only pending office action in the entire portfolio, this examiner holds total responsibility for the company's current interactions with the patent office. For practitioners, this means that the success of the current prosecution cycle depends entirely on the dialogue with this individual. There are no other pending matters to provide a baseline for comparison within the company's records, making each interaction with the examiner critical.
The alignment of the distinct examiner and the distinct art unit for the 1 pending office action highlights a streamlined but high-stakes prosecution environment. Because the Computing & Software field can be broad, the limitation to a single art unit suggests a narrow application of the company's technology. The workload is not divided, as the busiest examiner handles the pending action. This structure provides a clear and direct path for the company to advance its patent interests without the complexity of multiple examiners or art units.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | 1 | 62.7% | +37.1% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18701110 | A SAUNA OPERATIONAL STATE CONTROL SYSTEM | SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2116 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18701110 | A SAUNA OPERATIONAL STATE CONTROL SYSTEM | SIDDIQUEE, TAMEEM | 2116 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Apr 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialHealtech Pty Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Tameem Siddiquee has the most, with 1 of Healtech Pty Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Computing & Software (USPTO Tech Center 2100), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
