Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hi-Lex Act Corporation

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Hi-Lex Act Corporation is managing 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are assigned to 3 distinct examiners, yet they are all located within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated technical review process despite the variety of examiners. This situation allows the company to apply a unified technical strategy across its active matters, as the examiners are likely working under the same supervisory and art unit-specific guidelines.

The busiest examiner, NEYZARI, OMID, is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since the pending office actions are distributed across different examiners, the company must manage separate prosecution tracks within the same art unit environment. This distribution requires the company to be sensitive to the individual nuances of each examiner while maintaining a consistent technical narrative. The focus on the art unit suggests that the company's current innovations are closely related within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field, providing an opportunity to streamline responses based on shared art unit precedents.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
2
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AHMAD, FARIA F 1 76.7% +8.4%
NEYZARI, OMID 1 100.0% +0.0%
DUDA, RINA I 1 80.2% +10.1%
PONCIANO, PATRICK BERNAS 1 57.0% +7.6%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18917927 SLIDING DOOR DRIVING DEVICE DUDA, RINA I —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19076535 FRONT TRUNK SYSTEM AHMAD, FARIA F —
18967501 LATCH DEVICE FOR FRONT HOOD NEYZARI, OMID —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18917927 SLIDING DOOR DRIVING DEVICE DUDA, RINA I —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3675 1
3634 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19076535 FRONT TRUNK SYSTEM AHMAD, FARIA F 3675 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 11, 2025
18967501 LATCH DEVICE FOR FRONT HOOD NEYZARI, OMID — §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 03, 2024
18917927 SLIDING DOOR DRIVING DEVICE DUDA, RINA I — §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 16, 2024
18783107 DOOR OPENING AND CLOSING ASSISTANCE DEVICE PONCIANO, PATRICK BERNAS 3634 §103 Final Rejection 5d Pending Jul 24, 2024

Managing Hi-Lex Act Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month