Technology area: Communications
8 pending office actions • 6 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 30 patents granted in the last 365 days
HiDeep Inc. is currently managing 7 pending office actions within the Communications technology area. These 7 pending office actions are assigned to 7 distinct examiners, meaning every single pending application is being reviewed by a different individual. The portfolio is also distributed across 6 distinct art units, which indicates a broad technical range within the Communications sector for a portfolio of this size.
EDUN, MUHAMMAD N is the busiest examiner, though he is only responsible for 1 pending office action. This total lack of concentration among the 7 distinct examiners means that HiDeep Inc. cannot rely on a single relationship to advance its portfolio. Instead, the company must navigate the unique preferences of 7 different people across 6 distinct art units. With 7 pending office actions in play, the prosecution strategy must be highly individualized for each case. The diversity of 6 distinct art units suggests that the applications cover a variety of communication technologies, each with its own set of examination standards. The 1 pending office action assigned to the busiest examiner highlights the fragmented nature of this portfolio.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (25%) |
| §102 only | 1 (12%) |
| §112 only | 1 (12%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (12%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 3 (38%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| EDUN, MUHAMMAD N | 1 | 91.6% | -4.9% |
| PATEL, SANJIV D | 1 | 78.2% | +3.8% |
| YANG, NAN-YING | 1 | 77.9% | +8.2% |
| SHAH, SUJIT | 1 | 66.6% | +11.6% |
| NGUYEN, JIMMY H | 1 | 58.3% | +32.3% |
| KETEMA, BENYAM | 1 | 66.0% | +10.1% |
| MANDEVILLE, JASON M | 1 | 55.5% | +46.3% |
| SAADAT, CAMERON | 1 | 52.9% | +27.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19560363 | STYLUS PEN | EDUN, MUHAMMAD N | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19220509 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | KETEMA, BENYAM | 40d |
| 19306567 | TOUCH SENSOR AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE COMPRISING SAME | SHAH, SUJIT | — |
| 18673951 | TOUCH INPUT DEVICE | MANDEVILLE, JASON M | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19220509 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | KETEMA, BENYAM | 40d |
| 19306567 | TOUCH SENSOR AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE COMPRISING SAME | SHAH, SUJIT | — |
| 19241272 | FERRITE CORES AND STYLUS PEN INCLUDING THE SAME | NGUYEN, JIMMY H | — |
| 18673951 | TOUCH INPUT DEVICE | MANDEVILLE, JASON M | — |
| 18232036 | TOUCH SENSOR PANEL AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE WITH REDUCED MAGNITUDE OF LOW GROUND MASS INTERFERENCE SIGNAL | SAADAT, CAMERON | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2629 | 2 |
| 2626 | 2 |
| 2625 | 1 |
| 2624 | 1 |
| 2623 | 1 |
| 3992 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19560363 | STYLUS PEN | EDUN, MUHAMMAD N | 2629 | §102Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 09, 2026 |
| 19380028 | TOUCH SENSOR AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE COMPRISING SAME | PATEL, SANJIV D | 2625 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 05, 2025 |
| 19332368 | STYLUS PEN, ANTENNA MODULE, TOUCH SENSOR, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE | YANG, NAN-YING | 2629 | §103Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 18, 2025 |
| 19306567 | TOUCH SENSOR AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE COMPRISING SAME | SHAH, SUJIT | 2624 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 21, 2025 |
| 19241272 | FERRITE CORES AND STYLUS PEN INCLUDING THE SAME | NGUYEN, JIMMY H | 2626 | §103§112DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jun 17, 2025 |
| 19220509 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | KETEMA, BENYAM | 2626 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 40d | Pending | May 28, 2025 |
| 18673951 | TOUCH INPUT DEVICE | MANDEVILLE, JASON M | 2623 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | May 24, 2024 |
| 18232036 | TOUCH SENSOR PANEL AND TOUCH INPUT DEVICE WITH REDUCED MAGNITUDE OF LOW GROUND MASS INTERFERENCE SIGNAL | SAADAT, CAMERON | 3992 | §112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 09, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialHiDeep Inc. has 8 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 8 examiners.
Muhammad N Edun has the most, with 1 of HiDeep Inc.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
