Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Huvitz Co. Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions focused in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. While these 3 actions are handled by 3 distinct examiners, they are all concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This suggests that while the individual examiners vary, the technical classification of the inventions remains consistent across the portfolio. Such a concentration allows for a unified understanding of the art unit's specific examination standards.
The busiest examiner for this company is BULLINGTON, ROBERT P, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. Given that there are 3 pending office actions and 3 distinct examiners, each examiner is managing exactly 1 pending matter. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit means that although the practitioner interacts with 3 different people, the procedural norms of that specific art unit will apply to all 3 pending office actions. This structure provides a level of predictability regarding the examination environment despite the involvement of 3 distinct examiners. Practitioners can leverage their experience with the 1 distinct art unit to navigate the 3 pending office actions more efficiently.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 2 (67%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (33%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | 1 | 42.7% | +30.3% |
| HOLLY, LEE A | 1 | 75.0% | +5.9% |
| KING, GEORGE G | 1 | 57.8% | +37.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18903158 | PHOTOREFRACTION VISION SCREENING DEVICE | KING, GEORGE G | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18964012 | MODEL EYE HAVING POSTERIOR CORNEA REFLECTIVITY SIMILAR TO HUMAN EYE | BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | — |
| 18903158 | PHOTOREFRACTION VISION SCREENING DEVICE | KING, GEORGE G | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1742 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18964012 | MODEL EYE HAVING POSTERIOR CORNEA REFLECTIVITY SIMILAR TO HUMAN EYE | BULLINGTON, ROBERT P | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 29, 2024 |
| 18954639 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING ARTIFICIAL TOOTH | HOLLY, LEE A | 1742 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 21, 2024 |
| 18903158 | PHOTOREFRACTION VISION SCREENING DEVICE | KING, GEORGE G | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 01, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial