Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hyperspectral Corp.

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Hyperspectral Corp. is currently navigating 3 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These matters are distributed among 3 distinct examiners, resulting in a variety of individual perspectives on their patent applications. Despite the variety of examiners, all pending actions are located within 1 distinct art unit, which centralizes the administrative oversight of their portfolio.

KIDWELL, KAITLYN ELIZABETH is the busiest examiner for this company, currently managing 1 pending office action. The presence of 3 distinct examiners within a single art unit suggests that while the technical field is narrow, the company is engaging with multiple individuals in that group. This structure may lead to varied feedback even within a single specialized administrative unit.

With multiple examiners and 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's prosecution landscape is relatively focused. This allows for a concentrated approach to addressing examiner concerns within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics sector. The company can leverage its experience within the specified art unit to better understand the technical standards and procedural expectations that apply to its applications, even as it manages interactions with several examiners.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (67%)
§103 only1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
33% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
67% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KIDWELL, KAITLYN ELIZABETH 1 78.0% +20.0%
MARINI, MATTHEW G 1 60.5% +21.9%
PULLIAM, JOSEPH CONSTANTINE 1 38.1% +31.2%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19080483 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS USING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS KIDWELL, KAITLYN ELIZABETH —
18346749 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS BY ANALYZING SPECTRAL DATA PULLIAM, JOSEPH CONSTANTINE —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18358798 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING PARTICLES OF INTEREST USING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS MARINI, MATTHEW G 2d overdue
19080483 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS USING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS KIDWELL, KAITLYN ELIZABETH —
18346749 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS BY ANALYZING SPECTRAL DATA PULLIAM, JOSEPH CONSTANTINE —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2853 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19080483 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS USING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS KIDWELL, KAITLYN ELIZABETH — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2025
18358798 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING PARTICLES OF INTEREST USING SPECTRAL ANALYSIS MARINI, MATTHEW G 2853 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Jul 25, 2023
18346749 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING FOODBORNE PATHOGENS BY ANALYZING SPECTRAL DATA PULLIAM, JOSEPH CONSTANTINE — §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 03, 2023

Managing Hyperspectral Corp.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month