Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Hyundai Motor Company

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Hyundai Motor Company currently has 5 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 5 actions are assigned to 5 distinct examiners, meaning each examiner is reviewing exactly 1 pending matter for the company. The prosecution is distributed across 4 distinct art units, which suggests that most of the examiners are working in different specialized groups.

MOHAMAD O EL SAYAH is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, with 1 pending office action. Since each of the 5 distinct examiners has only 1 pending action, the workload is evenly split across the group. The presence of 4 distinct art units for only 5 pending office actions indicates a relatively broad technical spread for such a small number of active cases. Practitioners should expect to interact with 5 different individuals across 4 different units.

The 1:1 ratio of 5 pending office actions to 5 distinct examiners means that no single individual dominates the current prosecution landscape. Mohamad O El Sayah and the other 4 examiners will each apply their own standards to the pending matters. With 4 distinct art units involved, the company's transportation and mechanical innovations are being evaluated by several different specialized teams. This requires a tailored approach for each of the 5 pending office actions, as there is minimal overlap in the examination environment.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
4
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
EL SAYAH, MOHAMAD O 1 74.8% +4.4%
ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R 1 48.8% +19.2%
LAROSE, RENEE MARIE 1 79.0% +9.6%
CHENG, VIVIAN S 1 — —
SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J 1 46.0% +9.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19260804 POSE CORRECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF EL SAYAH, MOHAMAD O —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19093836 COMPRESSION MODULE FOR VEHICLE ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3658 1
3657 1
1781 1
3662 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19260804 POSE CORRECTION APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF EL SAYAH, MOHAMAD O 3658 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 07, 2025
19093836 COMPRESSION MODULE FOR VEHICLE ZERPHEY, CHRISTOPHER R — §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 28, 2025
18918483 Vehicle and Control Method Thereof LAROSE, RENEE MARIE 3657 §103 Non-Final OA 9d Pending Oct 17, 2024
18532610 HYDROGEN SUPPLY DEVICE, HYDROGEN FUEL CELL DEVICE, AND HYDROGEN CHARGING SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME CHENG, VIVIAN S 1781 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 07, 2023
18337306 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR INFORMING OF POWER OF VEHICLE SLOWIK, ELIZABETH J 3662 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 19, 2023

Managing Hyundai Motor Company's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Hyundai Motor Company have?

Hyundai Motor Company has 5 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 4 art units and 5 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Hyundai Motor Company applications?

Mohamad O El Sayah has the most, with 1 of Hyundai Motor Company's pending office actions.

What technology area are Hyundai Motor Company's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month