Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Ibss Group operates a patent portfolio in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This prosecution is being conducted by 1 distinct examiner and is situated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a concentrated effort in its current patent filings. This 1 pending office action is the sole focus of the company's current interactions with the patent office within this technology area.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is LEE, WILSON, who is handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This figure is identical to the total 1 pending office action for the company. This alignment shows that all current examiner-level communication is directed through LEE, WILSON. For the practitioner, this means that the prosecution outcome for the company is entirely dependent on the review of this 1 distinct examiner. Strategy should be developed with a focus on the specific technical requirements of the 1 distinct art unit and the individual examination style of LEE, WILSON.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, WILSON | 1 | 86.7% | +3.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18395115 | STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR CONCENTRATING PLASMA FOR INJECTION INTO A REACTION CHAMBER | LEE, WILSON | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2844 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18395115 | STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR CONCENTRATING PLASMA FOR INJECTION INTO A REACTION CHAMBER | LEE, WILSON | 2844 | §103 | Final Rejection | 34d | Pending | Dec 22, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial