Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Illumina Singapore Pte. Ltd.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Illumina Singapore Pte. Ltd. has 5 pending office actions concentrated in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These actions are handled by 5 distinct examiners, showing a high level of individual examiner engagement across the portfolio. This distribution means that prosecution strategies must be tailored to five different individual perspectives within the USPTO.

Prosecution activity spans 4 distinct art units. The busiest examiner, FUELLING, MICHAEL, accounts for 1 pending office action. This distribution suggests that while the technology area is consistent, the specific examination paths are diverse across multiple regulatory units. With the 5 distinct examiners involved, the company faces a broad range of potential examiner behaviors. The presence of 4 distinct art units further indicates that the portfolio covers a variety of sub-specialties within the broader biotechnology field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (20%)
3
Medium (60%)
1
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (20%)
§103 only1 (20%)
§112 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other2 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
80% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FUELLING, MICHAEL 1 43.7% +31.1%
ROSENTHAL, ANDREW S 1 51.8% +38.7%
YAMASAKI, ROBERT J 1 67.6% +43.7%
HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1 36.4% +20.7%
SISSON, BRADLEY L 1 19.7% +20.5%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17761972 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MULTIPLE ANALYTES SISSON, BRADLEY L 31d overdue
17754303 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A MEASURE CORRELATED TO THE PROBABILITY THAT TWO MUTATED SEQUENCE READS DERIVE FROM THE SAME SEQUENCE COMPRISING MUTATIONS HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17761972 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MULTIPLE ANALYTES SISSON, BRADLEY L 31d overdue
17932709 REAGENT COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, CARTRIDGES, AND SYSTEMS ROSENTHAL, ANDREW S 18d overdue
17719899 SYNTHESIS OF POLYNUCLEOTIDE BOTTLEBRUSH POLYMER YAMASAKI, ROBERT J 56d
18008954 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR SEQUENCING USING AT LEAST ALTERING ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BRIDGES BETWEEN ELECTRODES FUELLING, MICHAEL —
17754303 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A MEASURE CORRELATED TO THE PROBABILITY THAT TWO MUTATED SEQUENCE READS DERIVE FROM THE SAME SEQUENCE COMPRISING MUTATIONS HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1613 1
1657 1
1685 1
1682 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18008954 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR SEQUENCING USING AT LEAST ALTERING ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BRIDGES BETWEEN ELECTRODES FUELLING, MICHAEL — §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 07, 2022
17932709 REAGENT COMPOSITIONS, METHODS, CARTRIDGES, AND SYSTEMS ROSENTHAL, ANDREW S 1613 §103 Non-Final OA 18d overdue Pending Sep 16, 2022
17719899 SYNTHESIS OF POLYNUCLEOTIDE BOTTLEBRUSH POLYMER YAMASAKI, ROBERT J 1657 §102§103DP Final Rejection 56d Pending Apr 13, 2022
17754303 METHOD FOR DETERMINING A MEASURE CORRELATED TO THE PROBABILITY THAT TWO MUTATED SEQUENCE READS DERIVE FROM THE SAME SEQUENCE COMPRISING MUTATIONS HAYES, JONATHAN EDWARD 1685 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 29, 2022
17761972 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING MULTIPLE ANALYTES SISSON, BRADLEY L 1682 §112 Final Rejection 31d overdue Pending Mar 18, 2022

Managing Illumina Singapore Pte. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month