Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Indian Institute Of Technology Ropar is currently managing 2 pending office actions. These matters are distributed among 2 distinct examiners and 0 distinct art units. SATANOVSKY, ALEXANDER is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending action.
With 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each examiner is handling a single case. The report of 0 distinct art units may indicate specific administrative processing. SATANOVSKY, ALEXANDER handles 1 busiest examiner pending action out of the 2 pending office actions currently active for the institute. This distribution suggests that the prosecution is split between 2 distinct examiners. Practitioners should prepare for different examination styles for the matters currently in the pipeline.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SATANOVSKY, ALEXANDER | 1 | 56.7% | +19.1% |
| POOS, JOHN W | 1 | 93.4% | +4.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18647131 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LOCATING A SHEATH TO GROUND FAULT IN ELECTRIC CABLES | SATANOVSKY, ALEXANDER | — |
| 18615959 | EQUALIZER AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOF | POOS, JOHN W | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18647131 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LOCATING A SHEATH TO GROUND FAULT IN ELECTRIC CABLES | SATANOVSKY, ALEXANDER | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18647131 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF LOCATING A SHEATH TO GROUND FAULT IN ELECTRIC CABLES | SATANOVSKY, ALEXANDER | — | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
| 18615959 | EQUALIZER AND METHOD OF OPERATION THEREOF | POOS, JOHN W | — | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 25, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial